Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 28.06.2025 10:58

Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Don't call it a rom-com: With wit and heart, "Materialists" transcends the tired form - Salon.com
Russia can stop this any time.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
The #1 Herb for Better Gut Health, According to Dietitians - EatingWell
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
What’s next?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
NASA is already great. Right now. - NASA Watch
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
King Charles praised for 'faultless' firing technique at Larkhill - BBC
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Thank you.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Apple is on defense at WWDC 2025 - The Verge
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Simple blood test detects cancer up to 3 years before symptoms appear - Earth.com
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.